The Council last night unanimously defeated the motion to recognise the Soceity. Leader of the Council, Ivor Sheldon, said that there would be no regognition while I had anything to do with the Society because I had "slagged the council off in the press". Here's the letter to the Newbury Weekly that caused offence.
Dear Sir
The Wash Common Allotment Society is dismayed at the Town Council's 47% allotment rent increase. We've seen a 90% real-terms increase in rents since 2003 and having found out how the money is being spent we're utterly appalled at the Council's inefficiency.
Rental income hardly covers 20% of the service cost so with the burden of a £50k subsidy being shouldered by the tax-payer we completely sympathize with the need for change, but £41k of the service cost is administration. It's an outrageous amount, equivalent to £73 per plot, for work that an allotment society could do for a couple of quid. Comparable councils like Wantage Town Council manage to run their allotment service without a subsidy, and their plots cost half that of Newbury, so our Council is getting something seriously wrong.
The maintenance bill alone is almost half as much again as the rental income. The Society has several times asked the Council to involve the tenants in the site maintenance, and yet they refuse. Our membership survey reveals that 90% of our members want to help out, but the Council even changed the Rules to prevent this. We find this perverse in the extreme.
Working with the tenants is key. We enjoy the challenge and responsibility, the tax bill is kept under control, and the Council can then afford to open up new sites to accommodate the hundred-odd residents who are currently sitting on the waiting list.
We urge the Council to suspend the rent increase and embrace the Society, for the benefit of the allotmenteers and the Newbury tax payer.





